| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
6
   |
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
So supercaps still have a crapload of EHP (crapload multiplied by 0.8 is still a crapload, you know), total EW-immunity and no commitment? Moreover, instead you decide to reduce commitment for dreads.
Meh. Why so shy?
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
FlopSter wrote:Nopsa wrote:kool, any chance for slight nerf on titan jump portals also, hotdropping isn't very rare occurance. That mechanic works fine...they can't bridge very far as it is...
So what? Doomsday couldn't shoot very far, too - merely in grid 
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
651
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 01:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Tallest wrote:In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers.
Is it fair then that carriers use same (dirt-cheap) rigs as battleships?
Fon Revedhort for CSM 7 |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
651
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 01:52:00 -
[4] - Quote
Demon Azrakel wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:CCP Tallest wrote:In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers.
The poor performance of Minmatar capital ships is being looked at and was already being looked at before the blog was posted.
Pointing out flaws and issues with the balancing plan is very much appreciated. I will look into the issues and make changes where they are needed.
Once this hits SISI, I will start a thread in the test server feedback forums. Your concerns will be listened to and acted upon if necessary. Is it fair then that carriers use same (dirt-cheap) rigs as battleships? No, it is also not fair that they get the same ******* expensive rigs as SCs.
They are of the same class and share same capital mods, so I don't see how this particular thing is unfair. Both carriers and supercarriers are to use XL rigs which in turn should actually cost something.
Fon Revedhort for CSM 7 |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
651
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 19:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
Arcin Hamir wrote:While containing many good points I do suspect that this proposed change goes a bit too far. Perhaps some residual drone capacity for dreads, titans and supers could be retained rather than a complete lose of this capability.
Far??
This is a mere beginning. Otherwise it makes no sense.
Fon Revedhort for CSM 7 |
| |
|